Strongly smells of LLM-generated content with all those bulleted and numbered lists, and so on. I'm not one to automatically find the use of em-dashes to be an LLM "smell" — I use them all the time myself — but there are five of them in the post, adding to my suspicions.
And then looking at the rest of the site's articles seems to confirm it: the "OOP in Java vs FP in Clojure" article (linked at the bottom of the site) is just classic AI-generated "here are the parallels between these two topics" boilerplate.
B-trees are indeed cool, but I would prefer to read about them from someone who has actually written about them rather than farmed off the writing to a bot.
Strongly smells of LLM-generated content with all those bulleted and numbered lists, and so on. I'm not one to automatically find the use of em-dashes to be an LLM "smell" — I use them all the time myself — but there are five of them in the post, adding to my suspicions.
And then looking at the rest of the site's articles seems to confirm it: the "OOP in Java vs FP in Clojure" article (linked at the bottom of the site) is just classic AI-generated "here are the parallels between these two topics" boilerplate.
B-trees are indeed cool, but I would prefer to read about them from someone who has actually written about them rather than farmed off the writing to a bot.
The headings, subheadings, and sub-subheadings are also really suspicious.
I'd rather see articles with extreme brevity that distill the point in as few words or examples as possible.
I can use search or whatever to expand my knowledge if I find the subject worth "delving" into further.
Popular and common, sure, but there are other types of database storage. Hash tables for example. "Every database" is a bit of hyperbole.